Ask a male author about your male character traits or thoughts.

Amazon links to my stories: The Chess Master, Cinnamon & Sugar, Autumn Breeze, A More Perfect Union, Double Happiness, The Wolves of Sherwood Forest, Neanderthals and the Garden of Eden can be found down the right side of the blog. Another site very useful in categorizing books in their proper order is: https://www.booksradar.com/richard-rw/richard.html


Visit my website at: https://rwrichardnet.wordpress.com/

Sunday, January 28, 2018

About commas


THE TEN COMMANDMENTS

of commas

I have written earlier in this manual about why a liberal use of commas, especially while trying to show a pause of some kind, leads to rejection by agents and editors.

The Chicago Manual of Style, 17th edition, 2017, has twenty pages devoted to commas. Other manuals have similar girth. To make comma rules easier to remember, I’ve boiled down Chicago’s twenty pages to a quick, essential list.



I. Commas nearly always are placed on both sides of an added thought or a name in a sentence. Remember, a simple sentence has one thought. Rule: Add a thought; add a comma. Or two commas if the thought doesn’t end with a period. Hardly anyone understands the rare exceptions to this rule, so forget about it.

Examples:

The boss entered the room.

The boss, Matt Green, entered the room.

The boss, who was supposed to be somewhere else, entered the room.

Yes, sir. [not: Yes sir.]

Yes, sir, boss.



II. Commas are used to separate three or more items or thoughts. The last thought or item is usually preceded by an and or an or. When not preceded by an or or and the author is implying more items are not going to be mentioned, at least in this sentence. Note here that, in fiction, commas should be used instead of brackets, parentheses and sometimes em dashes. Using an em dash highlights the phrase or clause and is the author’s choice. Brackets, em dashes, and parentheses do much the same thing as a comma. They all separate two or more thoughts.

Examples:

Kathy brought grapes, crackers, and cheese to the meeting.

Kathy might read from her blog, short story, or novel.

An exception occurs when the adjectives say much the same thing, or they refer to a cultural expression, such as: little bitty pretty one… Note: little and bitty are much the same but pretty is different and would normally merit a comma if not at the end of the list Not that song lyrics or titles follow the rules of fiction or any other norm. By the way, not putting an and between bitty and pretty implies there’s more to this gal or it didn’t match the beats. Good enough, right?



III. Commas are used between two items or adjectives modifying a noun unless the adjectives describe much the same thing.

Examples:

She is a productive, popular writer. Not using an and between the two adjectives implies there is more.

She is like an little bitty doll. Some authors might choose to place a hyphen between little and bitty but that is getting small.

On July 4, 1776, a nation was born.

He lives at 1234 Main St., Anywhere, USA.



IV. Dependent clauses after a main clause should not need a comma, unless the dependent clause is supplementary or parenthetical. There is a vast army of writers who get this wrong. Editors and agents usually don’t ding the writer for this.

Example:

We’ll agree to not talk politics at the meeting unless we have extra time. […unless we have extra time is the dependent clause.]

Example of a supplementary idea:

At last he arrived, after the vote was taken.

Example of a parenthetical idea:

He has a point, whether you agree or not.



V. Using that or which in a sentence. That has no comma before it and generally is used to start a restrictive clause. Along with that one might see or use who, whom or whose to introduce the restriction. Which does have a comma before it and is not usually the beginning of a restrictive thought.

Examples:

The chapter that was required, was informative.

The chapter, which was well written, was well received by the critique group.

Exception:

Who, whom & whose will merit commas if used in a nonrestrictive way. [Using & instead of and in the previous sentence shows a minor exception to commas in series. With the & you don’t need one.]

Example:

The writer, who was drunk while reading, nonetheless managed. [The clause starting with the word who, described the writer but did not restrict the subject of the sentence.]



VI. Clarity rules all comma usage when trying to figure out sense or whether to use or not use the normal rules.

Examples:

The writer, reading his scene, stopped and threw his pages into the circular file.

Writers reading their scenes should not stop even if they hate them.



VII. One doesn’t always have to put a comma after an opening adverbial phrase if it is completely clear without the comma.

Example:

Before the writing group stood a writer of great fame.



VIII. A comma should follow an introductory yes, no, okay, well, and similar words or phrases.

Examples:

Oh, you’re right.

Exception:

Oh my God! [If you use an exclamation point, the comma isn’t necessary, but you might as well not submit your manuscript.]



IX. Use a comma before or after a she said or she replied, etc.

She said, “that was the worst scene I’ve ever heard.”

“Was that the worst scene you’ve ever heard,” she asked?

She replied, “you’re just jealous.”

An exception occurs when using an indirect quote:

She said something to the effect that you were just jealous.



X. Commas are not usually used to connect independent clauses. Usually a semi-colon or period is used unless the clauses are very short and have the same subject. Why? Well, maybe the two clauses shouldn’t really be in one sentence.

Examples:


The car has a full tank. All we need is a place to go.



Okay, for those of you who are grammarians or are blessed with a photographic memory. You might say I forgot a bit, such as, appositves, antithetical clauses, attributive compounds, elliptical constructions… Stop. Stop. Remember, Jesus, basically boiled down the ten commandments to two. Love God. Love your neighbor.

Being profane, I’ll make this simpler. Regarding commas:

Separate the sentence thoughts and items with commas but always err on the side of clarity.

Sunday, January 21, 2018

Moral relativism

Two sisters (heroines) come to the U.S. and meet and marry. One hero is conservative and the other is liberal. The gals, not knowing American politics, start leaning to the political direction of their husbands. Why? Well, you're heard many clichés about this. Finishing each others sentences, picking up traits, mannerisms. Basically, like all marriages, the man and wife compromise to get along.

But, you say, didn't they have politics in their home country? Yes, but it might have seemed different or unclear. Perhaps they were just learning life or had no interest as yet. Perhaps, they lived in a place where speaking up would lead to punishment. I think of the poor Iranian girl who died of an indiscriminate bullet, as seen on video, while she and many others were protesting or just going from one place to another. This young woman yearned to be free..

As time went on, the sisters and their husbands grew in love and respect becoming best friends in spite of their differing, and strongly held, views. They learned to minimize political discussions around each other because they found love to be the truth.

Am I suggesting moral relativism? No. first let's go over some of the ideas that divide and unite us. Abortion, climate, religion, atheism, pragmatism, egotism, a priori truths, sexual preferences, gun rights, human rights, animal rights...

I'll pick one. A priori truths. Nearly everybody agrees that all men are created equal. Many take it a step further to believe and practice the golden rule. Nearly every philosophy, lays down as the tenant to life that we must treat (do to) another human being as we would want to be treated (done to).

Have I painted myself into a corner? No, realize that your friend of differing opinion has had different life experiences. I don't know about you, but when writing, I look at the arc. In life, I abhor those who act in criminal ways or don't, through their actions or words, live by the golden rule. I don't blame those who side with this antagonist in real life. I don't try to educate them. Why? To educate you must have the time and understanding of what makes them tick. You must walk in their shoes and try on their inner motivations. Nearly impossible unless you are a writer. If it gets serious in this country, at least we have the courts. Lead by example. If the person is receptive to discussion, they'll let you know.

Back to the two couples. They are real. It occurs all the time. Who among us is so smug to be the only one to know the truth. I suggest, the truth is in our common humanity based on life experiences and emotions more the logic. The reason you can't change the other too easily should be logically obvious. Typically for every opinion or belief there is an opposite and equal counterbalancing opinion. Approximately, there are as many republicans as democrats, as many men as women Who's right? God has often so finely balanced us by making women and men different along with opinions on problems we confront. It's our job to seek the truth, but don't forget to honor a person who is also seeking the truth that may seem at odds with your understanding. I'm not going to argue with the Creator.

Since this is part of everybody's lives, it can be used as a tool in writing. Be real, showing emotion and logic is about the struggle to understand oneself and the other.

Sunday, January 14, 2018

Clarity in writing




CLARITY

Lack of clarity in a submission is the number one reason why an author’s work gets rejected. Think about it. Clarity can be, and for my purposes, is found in the previous nine reasons that lead to rejection.

1.      ! The use of symbols when words are better. An exclamation point has more than one meaning.

2.      Blasting queries. Using the one size fits all approach shows the agent or editor that you either didn’t think through your submission or you didn’t care.

3.      Not reading books on writing is like jumping out of a plane without a parachute. Reading clarifies in the writer’s mind which of many paths to take.

4.      Not joining critique groups, going to conferences or joining genre organizations leaves the author uncertain how to proceed (and without kindred spirits).

5.      Commas are much like exclamation points regarding clarity. Using commas to show breathing, pause, surprise, confusion, stroke etc. confuses the agent or editor. Because the comma isn’t a word, it’s anybody’s guess why those extra commas are there.

6.      Overusing complicated and multi-thought sentences is like knocking out an opponent in a boxing match. Except you are the loser.

7.      If the first chapter is used to set up the story by immersing the reader in the normal life of the protagonist, the agent or editor will reject the manuscript. They don’t understand because the author’s purpose is unclear.

8.      Head hopping or omniscient narration leaves agents. editors and potential readers confused.

9.      A lack of emotion in a character leads to a lack of emotional attachment in the story by the reader. To be clear, emotion in a character, as I define it, is not all about crying, laughing, smiling, etc. It’s precisely how a character reacts, acts, thinks or talks in any given situation. Done right, the reader is hooked, because they “get” (understand) and identify with the character.

10.  Clarity.

Clarity brings a scene and book into focus. Say Moby Dick and most people will be able to speak in metaphors and about memorable characters.

Crisp dialogue gives a story a magical or charming quality. Is there anybody out there who has not a clue what movie this came from, “I’ll have what she’s having” or “Here’s looking at you, kid”? Here's a harder one, "nobody's perfect". Stilted dialogue is often bogged down and defined by clichés, unnatural usage or wordiness. Less is more and original but understood expressions are what we all want.

Although interior intimate thought can meander to show indecision, we need to keep an eye on tentative resolution in the character’s mind or, at least, some change in the arc of the character. If the character is lost for too long, often the reader will find ways to lose the book.

A character cannot remain stoic while all hell is breaking loose about him scene after scene. Why? The character shows no change, no action. A novel is all about change. Otherwise it could be called the diary of a mad author.